COMBUSTION CHAMBER MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2016
FACILITATOR: Prost
STACK: Henry
SCRIBE: Chim-Chim
ATTENDEES: Notfunnyatall, Hawk, Pixie, Izzi, Problem, Thomas, Beth, Adam, Clover, Breezy, Chim-Chim, Prost, Turtlebunnie, Princess, St. Tiki, Clovis, Wrinn, Decibel, Monkey, Bonobo
TOPICS: Review CC nominations messages (All); Increasing Community Engagement (Beth)
RESOLUTIONS AND ACTION ITEMS
MOTION: To have Q&A mixer on May 9th where we let community members field questions to the CC; MOTION PASSES
MOTION: Calendar meetings into mixers; MOTION TABLED
8:04pm AAR/LLC UPDATE (Adam/Problem)
- Work weekend happened this past weekend; Good turnout; Many ppl who have never been to FS or work weekend; Bobcat was out there; Land is in pretty good shape; Main field was plowed six times to be leveled out; Mostly all dirt now; Most down trees have been dealt with; Island beach is too high; Killed poison ivy; Patching spots on road
- Signing contract to have Flipside
- Tix: Some secondary tix will be available
- Safetyside is April 15-17th
- Discussion over whether Burning Flipside will eventually be called a Burning Man regional; Reasonable, equitable agreement?
- Ticket sales/requests: Tix set aside—under 3000; 200 less requests than last year; 100 less; General participant interest is down a little; Previous was soft lottery; General number: Requests for 2901 tickets; Request number was lower; what is trend for one vs two requests; comprehensive report still being worked on
8:23pm AREA FACILITATOR UPDATE (Clovis/Wrinn)
- Meeting next week
- Had two TH road shows
- Few theme camps showed up for safety thirdside
8:25pm REGIONAL UPDATE (Clovis/St. Tiki)
- GLC Thursday through Sunday this week
- BM meetup at Beau’s Sekrit Theater
- BM going through a lot of changes
- Negotiating regional agreement
- Houston had their regional event; 185 attended; Not a Burn, but a production company + core ppl; LLC does not have enough info to produce report
- Giant ear gathering in SF—Discussion over how to handle natural disaster event; Did not have hard time getting ppl for lead positions; Rains were more causative; Hard data will be more available near Safetyside; Expect smaller event
- No real systemic issues this year; Volunteer recruitment is still going; Same with Lead recruitment;
- Last year’s Flipside was already hard with 3 key volunteers dropping out before the event; Not many ppl were personally affected by flood; Lots affected by general rain/mud
- Do good job in recognizing volunteer life cycle; Many have disengaged for many years and at some point, come back in; We do a good job at succession planning, lieutenants, sharing, etc.; Weather—No control, and a learning experience; Update on Regionals—San Antonio regional in the works
8:48pm TOPIC: Increasing Community Engagement (Beth)
- Encouraging community engagement; Community not engaging with CC; How we can ask community? Brainstorming session of what do we change, how do we change, what are we missing?
- How to reach out to ppl and get them to talk about what they wanna talk about?
- In terms of basic outreach, there are bits of info; What is it you’re trying to do? Valve for politics, but decisions are made in person, and focus is on interpersonal relationships in person; If you aren’t engaged enough, then get engaged
- Throw mud at the wall and see what sticks; Everyone working on trying new social media; Part of job is being a safety valve for the community;
- Can look at interest of community as a funnel where only certain ppl are interested; Getting a good proportion; If it were easy, we would market as product; Ethics on communication; Most efficient use of communication?
- Why does CC exist, and what is it for? Came to existence through addressing issues; Both regionally and socially, those groups have changed and expanded; Want to reach out and at least let them know where to go
- There is no welcoming committee here; If you work hard with ppl, you’ll find connections
- CC communications; Meeting annnouncements put out in more than one medium; CC is supposed to represent a broad cross-section of the community; CC is a bunch of individuals; If you feel the way CC is lacking in its communications, start by individual level
- I think we’re doing fine; When there are issues, we discuss; Get meetings as such to where we get off topic
- Focusing ppl to using the web; Talk to certain groups; Having consistent place to direct ppl for info
- Reach more ppl than we think; Talk more about CC than community; If you want community to be engaged, do something that community cares about
- Should sequester CC business and focus; Have one CC meeting a month focusing on issue; We control the agenda; No reason why we have to do engagement; Operational components of CC are only of interests to us; We have reached the point of overdoing it; Community topic of the month?; There are enough issues on list of topics to change scenario
- Reason why adamant in having topic separate from social media was because we didn’t have adequate number of topics in the past; Feel like we’re not doing our job somehow; Used to have things to fill in calendar, but now we don’t. Where are we failing? How to get those topics so we aren’t discussing CC operations
- Had several gangbuster CC meetings with good attendance
- Operational capacity of CC and comm of community are unrelated; Discussions of TH are distraction from mission; Discussion of comm things are distraction from TH; Fifth of meetings are about TH; 20% discussion over internal business
- Love idea of protecting space just for community engagement; Pin ourselves to corner if you have to wait to announce
- Open forum where we tell community, LLC, AF, CC member; Bring topic or put on agenda item; if it’s operational, will be discussed
- Start with dedicated meeting (Flipside Q&A) and see what we get
MOTION: Schedule in near future a CC meeting specifically on open Q&A that includes LLC
- Amend that we make this May 9 for pre-Flipside topic;
- Call it a mixer rather than a meeting cuz a meeting sounds like it sucks
- Let community know in advance in as many mediums
- Do more than just one meeting; Dedicate time at every meeting to discuss what everyone wants to talk about; Went on tangent in GLC convo; Free-form conversation; Own topic for certain amount of time; Figure out what needs to be actual CC conversations
- Mixer instead of calendaring meeting
- As calendaring mixer, it’s a good idea cuz it gives opportunity to bring ppl back in
MOTION (Revised): To have Q&A mixer on May 9th where we let community members field questions to the CC; MOTION PASSES
MOTION: Calendar meetings into mixers; MOTION TABLED
- Back on original stack: Listen and learn luau; More interaction in street than in meetings
- Conversation that TH—Differing evaluation of TH; Best characterization of interest to FS is through TH; Encourage CC to think about having possibilities at TH; They’re already there; What is the measure of success that we are looking for? Perrenial convos are important
- LLC/AF/REGIONAL UPDATE are useless? I disagree. This is only place you can hear info on things such as regional burns and MGP;
- Amount of communication nowadays is multichanneled that it’s hard for anyone to communicate effectively; Attention span has degraded (tl; dr); Need to do Cliff Notes version; Now we are headline writers!
- Challenges: Business update sections can be long
- Opening aspect is good for transparency; Not marketing, but branding of CC; Brand issue; Brand recognition not there
9:55pm OLD BUSINESS
- Doodle
- Review CC nomination email: TABLED
- CC Scribe nomination process: Get ppl at mixer
- SUBTOPIC: Streaming CC Meetings
- How long to wait?
- Privacy issues?
- Create secure wait to interact
- Hardware is inexpensive; Certain infrastructure involved
- Logistically, we tried Google hangouts; Need to look at WebX as solution, means stream to server, they stream out more; Ticketing; Transparently non-transparent; Talking at GLC easier to talk in person; Stack on WebX? Would change our meetings
- Things to look at if given options: Perceived burden on those who live near; Does have some benefits, but has limitations
- Philosophical comment: Decide who can be at meeting through streaming; Only CC members; Community attends actual meeting; Philosophy is what matters; Don’t worry about technology
- 3 points: Who would participate first? Just CC? AFs? Or public? It squelches conversation; Screen Captcha? Only CC members can attend; Certain topics shouldn’t be necessarily discussed further outside of room
- Have had meetings in past recorded without consent; It’s not impossible to have these recorded now; How much do we trust; Logistical nightmare; Philosophically, not immune to it; POI: Legal to record; Not legal to publish elsewhere
- 17 CC members; If we all attended, we would have much longer meetings; When you are remote, potential for distraction
- Remote: May take away from participation
- Terms of service to offer to community? Would have to have thorough review; Phone teleconferencing might be best way; Video streaming is more restrictive to openness and honesty; It’s the lube that keeps the organization going; How to get community to teleconference
- Problems with streaming: Any time you call in to meeting, you are already considered 2nd class in convo; $1000/yr for 14 ppl total; Where does line end?
- Leveraging participants discussion; Proposal is trying streaming once; Limitations in execution (first 5 ppl); Number of hot topics are limited, therefore do ‘in-person’ only; There should be some kind of middle ground; Bridge to greater participation
- Presented with unique situation
- Not all CC members live in Austin; Community members cannot participate unless in person; Only St. Tiki can participate?
- Extend CC membership to outside realms outside of Austin; Wouldn’t be fair to only have St. Tiki participate in streaming; Non-disclosure agreement not to release/rebroadcast to community; Have to be willing to take seriously; How to establish level of commitment and trust? Can’t change community perception
- Do we want to go into corporate culture? More immediate and less corporate; What makes a CC member and deserving of this privilege? Where do we draw that line? If 20 community members and 10 cc members, how does that make us look?
- Currently seeing 3-4 ppl that cannot participate; Monitor and revisit
- Limitations: If kids are involved, you won’t be able to make call; Place for people to meet in person
- CC Scribe nomination process: Mer makes call for nominations
NEXT MEETING: MONDAY, APRIL 11, 2016
FACILITATOR: Cooper
STACK: Decibel
SCRIBE: Chim-Chim
TOPICS: Fireworks, Social Media
10:45pm MEETING ADJOURNED